July 20, 2017. Moscow, Russia.
PJSC RusHydro (ticker symbol: MICEX-RTS, LSE: HYDR; OTCQX: RSHYY)
announces its operating results for the 2nd quarter and
1st half of 2017 of the parent company and the
subsidiaries of RusHydro Group reflected in consolidated financial
statements.
Key highlights:
Strong hydropower output in the 2nd
quarter of 2017 against the background of prolonged ample water
inflows to reservoirs of the Volgo-Kama cascade and inlfows to
reservoirs in Siberia and Far East of Russia close to long-run
average.
Total electricity generation by power
plants of RusHydro Group in 2Q 2017 amounted to 34,409 GWh
(+6.4%), in 1H 2017 – 63,535 GWh (+0.7%).
In 2Q 2017, total production by hydropower
and pumped storage plants amounted to 27,506 GWh (+7.1%), total
output by fossil fuel and geothermal plants – 6,903 GWh (+3.6%).
In 1H 2017, total production by hydropower
and pumped storage plants amounted to 47,959 GWh (+2.4%),
total output by fossil fuel and geothermal plants – 15,576 GWh
(-4.3%).
In 1Q 2016, total water inflow to
reservoirs of the Volga-Kama cascade, HPPs of Siberia and the Far
East of Russia was higher than long-run average, to reservoirs in
the South of Russia – slightly higher or close normal.
The electricity generation by the
Boguchanskaya hydropower plant in 1H 2017 amounted to 6,748 GWh
(+3.9%) [1].
Water inflow to reservoirs of Volga-Kama
cascade is expected 35-45% higher than long-run average, to
reservoirs of the South of Russia, Siberia and Far East – close to
or slightly higher than long-run average.
Electricity generation by the plants of RusHydro
Group, GWh
|
2Q’17
|
2Q’16
|
chg, %
|
1H’17
|
1H’16
|
Chg, %
|
Center of Russia
|
15,057
|
12,686
|
18.7%
|
23,785
|
22,485
|
5.8%
|
S. of Russia and N.Caucasus
|
2,259
|
2,587
|
-12.7%
|
3,463
|
4,186
|
-17.3%
|
Siberia
|
6,545
|
6,676
|
-2.0%
|
12,333
|
12,319
|
0.1%
|
Total for the price zones
|
23,861
|
21,949
|
8.7%
|
39,581
|
38,990
|
1.5%
|
Far East
|
3,151
|
3,279
|
-3.9%
|
7,227
|
6,709
|
7.7%
|
RAO ES of the East
|
7,202
|
6,961
|
3.5%
|
16,493
|
17,195
|
-4.1%
|
Armenia
|
195
|
144
|
35.3%
|
233
|
216
|
8.1%
|
TOTAL
|
34,409
|
32,334
|
6.4%
|
63,535
|
63,110
|
0.7%
|
incl. by HPPs, PSPPs [2]
|
27,506
|
25,671
|
7.1%
|
47,959
|
46,835
|
2.4%
|
incl. by TPPs and other
|
6,903
|
6,662
|
3.6%
|
15,576
|
16,275
|
-4.3%
|
Boguchanskaya HPP
|
3,572
|
3,365
|
6.2%
|
6,748
|
6,491
|
3.9%
|
The underlying factors of the production change in
January-June 2017 were:
total water inflow to reservoirs of the
Volga-Kama cascade in the 1st half of 2017 was higher
than normal;
water inflow to major reservoirs of Siberia
was on the level of previous year or slightly lower;
water inflow to hydropower plants of the
South of Russia on the normal level or slightly higher than long-run
average;
lower electricity consumption in the Far East
of Russia and lower export of electricity from the United Power
System of the East to United Power System of Siberia and China.
Center of Russia
Due to early spring in the 1st quarter
inflow to reservoirs of Upper Volga was 2.1-3.5x higher than the
norm, inflows to Gorkovskoye and Cheboksarskoye reservoirs –
1.6-1.7x higher. Total inflow to reservoirs of Volga and Kama in the
1st quarter was 33.2 km3 against the long-run
average of 21.3 km3.
Due to warm March the flooding in the Upper Volga
began almost two week ahead of regular schedule, but cold weather in
April, with freezing at night, affected the pattern of the flooding.
During the 2nd quarter the flooding had volatile pattern
with periodic distinctive rain-driven peaks of inflows. Total inflow
to reservoirs on Volga and Kama in the 2nd quarter was 162
km3 against the long-run average of 161 km3.
Volatile inflows on Volga and Kama led to several
absolute record of monthly output by Nizhegorodskaya, Cheboksarskaya
and Saratovskaya HPPs. Main factors enabling high output were
favorable hydrological situation and appropriate management of HPPs
regimes allowing minimizing sterile spills, optimizing heads and
increasing efficiency.
Flooding inflows to most reservoirs of the
Volga-Kama cascade were prolonged and substantially higher than
long-run average, in the case of Zhigulevskaya and Kamskaya HPPs the
inflows were almost 3 times higher than average. Given absence of
free reservoir volumes most HPPs of the cascade switched to transit
regimes and sterile spills.
In June, inflows to Volga and Kama reservoirs
totaled 38.7 km3 or 64% above the long-run average, in
July the inflows are expected in the range of 20.4-24.4 km3 or,
in average, 58% above the norm.
Water content in the Volga-Kama cascade reservoirs
as of the first decade of July was higher than the long-run average
level by 11%, while overall inflows to the reservoirs of the cascade
are 2x higher than the long-run average.
Total production by the hydropower plants of
Volga-Kama cascade, operated by RusHydro group, and Zagorskaya pumped
storage in the 2nd quarter of 2017 increased by 18.7%
against the same figure of 2016 to 15,057 GWh, in the 1st
half of 2017 – increased by 5.8% to 23,785 GWh.
South of Russia and North Caucasus
Hydrological conditions on the rivers of the South
of Russia and North Caucasus in the 1st half of 2017 were
close to long-run average or up to 20% higher. The Chirkeyskoe and
Irganayskoe reservoirs are currently being filled up.
The electricity generation by the hydropower
plants of the South of Russia and North Caucasus in the 2st
quarter of 2017 decreased against previous year by 12.7% to 2,259
GWh, in the 1st half of the year decreased by 17.3% to
3,463 GWh.
Siberia
In the 1st quarter of 2017, water
inflow to Novosibirskoe and Sayano-Shushenskaya hydropower plants
reservoirs was 30-45% higher than normal, inflow to Lake Baikal was
70% higher than normal. Inflows to other reservoirs in Siberia were
close to the long-run average.
Unlike Boguchanskaya and Sayano-Shushesnkaya
hydropower plants reservoir of Novosibirskaya hydropower plant
experienced early onset of the spring flooding already in the end of
the 1st quarter. The flooding was passing in relatively
even regime but due to peak rains overlapping with the flooding,
water inflows had two distinctive peaks. The overall volume of the
flooding totaled 30.1 km3 – 6% higher than the long-run
average and on the level of previous year.
Sayano-Shushesnkaya, after the planned draw-down
of the reservoir to the minimum admissible level of 500 meters,
entered regime of filling-up in order to accumulate the water
resources required for operations in winter. As of the beginning of
high water/flooding period of 2017 and in accordance with methodology
for determining maximum filling level, the maximum level to which the
reservoir might be filled up is set at 538.5 meters, or, in case of
favorable conditions at 539 meters, which is the maximum level since
the moment the plant was fully restored.
The Angara cascade, like in the previous year, is
going through low water period. Boguchankskaya hydropower plant is
working in accordance with instructions of the Yenisei Basin
Directorate in order to provide sufficient levels of water to allow
navigation in the Lower Angara.
In general, during the 2nd quarter
water inflows to reservoirs of Novosibirskaya was close to normal,
while inflows to reservoirs of Sayano-Shushenskaya and Lake Baikal by
15%-25% below normal.
Total electricity generation by RusHydro’s
Siberian hydropower plants in the 2st quarter of 2017
decreased by 2.0% to 6,545 GWh, in the 1st half of 2017
insignificantly increased – by 0.1% to 12,333 GWh.
The Boguchanskaya hydropower plant in the 2st
quarter of 2017 generated 3,572 GWh, 6.2% increase as compared to the
same period of the previous year, in the 1 half of the year – 6,748
GWh (+3.9%).
Far East
In the 2nd quarter of 2017 water
inflows to reservoirs in the Far East was close to normal (inflows to
some reservoirs was 10% higher than normal). Given the
hydro-meteorological conditions in the region the high water/flooding
period is proceeding, in general, in regular regime.
Total electricity generated by hydro and
geothermal power plants of the Far East in the 2st quarter
of 2017, decreased by 3.9% to 3,151 GWh, in the 1st half
of the year – increased by 7.7% against the same period of previous
year to 7,227 GWh.
In the 2st quarter of 2017, generating
assets of RAO ES of East Subgroup, a subsidiary of RusHydro, produced
7,202 GWh, or 3,5% higher than in the 2nd quarter of 2016.
Of this total, 77% was generated by JSC Far East Generating Company
(DGK), which increased production by 4.2% in the 2st
quarter of 2017, mainly due to decrease in output by Bureyskaya HPP,
as well as increase in electricity consumption in the United Power
System of the East by 0.2% and higher outflows of electricity to
China and United Power System of Siberia by 7.5% as compared to the
previous year.
Overall electricity production by RAO ES of East
Subgroup in the 1st half of 2017 decreased by 4.1% to
16,493 GWh.
In the 1st half of 2017, heat output by
thermal plants of RAO ES of the East decreased by 8.2% to 16,756
thousand GCal as compared to 2016. The decrease is due to higher
temperatures and reduced length of heating season in a number of
towns of the region.
Heat output by thermal plants of RAO ES of the
East, ths. GCal
|
2Q’17
|
2Q’16
|
chg, %
|
1H’17
|
1H’16
|
chg,%
|
JSC DGK
|
3,016
|
3,242
|
-7.0%
|
11,657
|
12,707
|
-8.3%
|
PJSC Yakutskenergo
|
334
|
344
|
-5.8%
|
1,311
|
1,397
|
-6.1%
|
SC Sakhaenergo
|
14
|
15
|
-10.9%
|
49
|
54
|
-10.8%
|
SC Teploenergoservice
|
171
|
192
|
-10.9%
|
698
|
766
|
-8.9%
|
PJSC Kamchatskenergo
|
417
|
467
|
-10.9%
|
1,123
|
1 331
|
-15.6%
|
SC KSEN
|
16
|
15
|
9.2%
|
46
|
49
|
-5.8%
|
PJSC Magadanenergo
|
254
|
232
|
9.7%
|
695
|
730
|
-4.7%
|
SC Chukotenergo
|
101
|
103
|
-1.9%
|
260
|
277
|
6.2%
|
JSC Sakhalinenergo
|
332
|
325
|
2.2%
|
917
|
948
|
-3.3%
|
Total
|
4,654
|
4,935
|
-5.7%
|
16,756
|
18,260
|
-8.2%
|
Armenia
In the 1st half of 2017, electricity
generation by the Sevan-Hrazdan cascade of hydropower plants in
Armenia increased by 8.1% to 233 GWh. The power generation by the
plants of the cascade is dependent on water inflows of the Hrazdan
river and water releases from Sevan lake.
Electricityretail
In the 1st half of 2017, total
electricity output by RusHydro’s retail companies, operating in
Chuvashia, Ryazan and Krasnoyarsk regions, amounted to 10,609 GWh, a
4.5% decrease as compared to the same period of 2016.
The decrease in output is driven by a number of
consumers switching to wholesale electricity purchases (primarily in
Krasnoyarsk region), higher temperatures, and additional calendar day
in 2016 due to leap year, as well as lower purchase of electricity
for compensation of losses by grid companies on the back of overall
reduction in electricity consumption.
Electricity
output by RusHydro Group’s retail companies, GWh [3]
|
2Q’17
|
2Q’16
|
chg, %
|
1H’17
|
1H’16
|
chg, %
|
Krasnoyarskenergosbyt
|
2,720
|
2,879
|
-5.5%
|
6,416
|
7,084
|
-9.4%
|
Chuvash retail company
|
755
|
704
|
7.2%
|
1,688
|
1,626
|
3.8%
|
Ryazan retail company
|
601
|
600
|
0.2%
|
1,336
|
1,345
|
-0.7%
|
ESC RusHydro
|
589
|
532
|
10.7%
|
1,169
|
1,053
|
11.0%
|
Total
|
4,664
|
4,714
|
-1.1%
|
10,609
|
11,108
|
-4.5%
|
Water inflows forecast
According to the forecast of the Hydrometeorologic
Center of Russia, the following dynamics of water inflows to the
major reservoirs is expected in the 3d quarter of 2017:
water inflow to Volga reservoirs upstream
from Nizhny Novgorod is expected at a long-run average level,
inflows to Cheboksarskoye, Kuybyshevskoye and Nizhnekamskoye
reservoirs will by 1.3-1.7x higher than normal. Total inflows to
reservoirs on Volga and Kama is expected in the range of 46-54 km3
as compared to the average of 37.0 km3);
water inflow to major reservoirs on Ob’,
Yenisei and Angara is expected to be 15-25% s higher than normal;
water inflow to the reservoirs of hydropower
plants located in the North Caucasus is expected to be close to
long-run average;
water inflow to hydro plants of Zeyskaya and
Kolymskaya hydropower plants is expected to be 15-60% higher than
long-run average.
[1]
The Boguchanskaya hydropower plant is part of the Boguchanskiy
Energy and Metals Complex (BEMO), a 50/50 joint venture (JV) between
RusHydro and UC RUSAL, and is not part of RusHydro Group. According
to RusHydro’s shareholding in the JV (50%), the results of the
plant are reported in the official financial statements in “Share
of results of associates and jointly controlled entities”.
Operations of the HPP have been put into the press-release for
general reference.
[2]
Includes generation by HPPs of JSC RusHydro, Kolymskaya HPP and
Viluyskie HPPs, part of RAO ES of East group.
[3]
2016 data doesn’t include operating data of Bashkiria electricity
retail company divested to Inter RAO Group in December 2016.
|